http://Pixton.com/ic:9j1lwav3
A remix to a funny comic.
skkai's College Lit Blog
Blog for Mr. Kunkle's college literature class. Expect LOTS OF FUN!!!
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Friday, May 27, 2011
Persepholis
When I first heard that we were reading this book, I felt excited. There were several people that I meet that recommended me to read that book. The first page is one that I've seen elsewhere multiple times. I can only say it surpassed my expectation.
I read the first assigned reading pages, and then a LOT after by accident because it's very interesting artistically and plot wise. The inside humor is most entertaining, like how Marx and Descartes were bickering against each other on pages 42 and 43.
SPOILER ALERT
I also cried when her uncle was killed in prison as a Russian spy. He seemed so cool and loving of Marji. Even the way that Satrapi drew him much differently make him seem more peculiar and interesting. But the author did such a great job of capturing the essence of the terror and emotion during that entire chapter. It seemed more like I was watching a movie than reading a book.
I read the first assigned reading pages, and then a LOT after by accident because it's very interesting artistically and plot wise. The inside humor is most entertaining, like how Marx and Descartes were bickering against each other on pages 42 and 43.
SPOILER ALERT
I also cried when her uncle was killed in prison as a Russian spy. He seemed so cool and loving of Marji. Even the way that Satrapi drew him much differently make him seem more peculiar and interesting. But the author did such a great job of capturing the essence of the terror and emotion during that entire chapter. It seemed more like I was watching a movie than reading a book.
Challenged Books
Challenging a book is different from banning a book. When a book is first considered to be restricted, it's considered challenged. Once that book has been removed or restricted, it's been banned.
Usually, books are usually challenged because they view them as damaging to the public through ideas. Most of the books challenged are to protect children. countries tend to ban books with ideas or information that counter the ideals that the country wants to promote. For example: the United States views sex as taboo, so books that glamorizes sex or the like tend to be challenged. Books that deal with science or other revolutionary ideas go against previous ideals for religious croups like the Roman Catholics, so they may ban them like during the renaissance.
According to ALA, the parents by far initiate the challenge by 54% followed by patrons (13%), Administrator (9.3%), and board members (2.9%). The different places where books are challenged include schools (36%), school libraries (33%), and public libraries (24%).
After a book is challenged, there tends to be a hearing about the book similar to a trial. Proper ways to do a challenge includes getting the committee or at least some of them to actually read the book. Usually, common questions brought up about the book includes, did the book receive any awards? What reviews did the book get? What are the complaints? Have the students read the book entirely? by choice or curriculum?
Several commonly banned books include Of Mice and Men, Harry Potter, The Color Purple, Kaffir Boy, To Kill A Mocking Bird, Slaughterhouse-Five, Lord of the Flies, and Where's Waldo?
Once specific case is of the book, The Color Purple, by Alice Walker. It was challenged in schools, usually in the south, because of it's sexually explicit, the main character gets raped as a child, and it involves violence and offensive language. Usually, the schools comment that the book is too sexually explicit for 12-year-olds, or inappropriate for 10th graders. Some schools provided the option where students over the age of 18 can read the library's copy with a parent permission whereas some schools completely banned it from the library.
I can understand why the book would be banned--I have actually read it. I agree that it's not something that the average 12-year-old would read because of the pace of book and the subject matter. The first few "chapters" (the book is written in letter format) pass in a slow speed that's somewhat confusing the first read-through. I would just imagine that anyone who isn't mature enough to handle the subject matter wouldn't even make it pass the first 50 pages. It is an intriguing read that I think should be available at the high school level. I do feel like that the book should at least have a note or forewarning provided by the librarian or teacher that the book does have some language and sexuality, almost like what they do for television shows and movies.
http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1045361-The-Color-Purple-and-Its-Controversy
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.china/2005-11/msg00592.html
http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychallenged/challengesbytype/index.cfm
What to do if a book is challenged
List of Challenged books
Usually, books are usually challenged because they view them as damaging to the public through ideas. Most of the books challenged are to protect children. countries tend to ban books with ideas or information that counter the ideals that the country wants to promote. For example: the United States views sex as taboo, so books that glamorizes sex or the like tend to be challenged. Books that deal with science or other revolutionary ideas go against previous ideals for religious croups like the Roman Catholics, so they may ban them like during the renaissance.
According to ALA, the parents by far initiate the challenge by 54% followed by patrons (13%), Administrator (9.3%), and board members (2.9%). The different places where books are challenged include schools (36%), school libraries (33%), and public libraries (24%).
After a book is challenged, there tends to be a hearing about the book similar to a trial. Proper ways to do a challenge includes getting the committee or at least some of them to actually read the book. Usually, common questions brought up about the book includes, did the book receive any awards? What reviews did the book get? What are the complaints? Have the students read the book entirely? by choice or curriculum?
Several commonly banned books include Of Mice and Men, Harry Potter, The Color Purple, Kaffir Boy, To Kill A Mocking Bird, Slaughterhouse-Five, Lord of the Flies, and Where's Waldo?
Once specific case is of the book, The Color Purple, by Alice Walker. It was challenged in schools, usually in the south, because of it's sexually explicit, the main character gets raped as a child, and it involves violence and offensive language. Usually, the schools comment that the book is too sexually explicit for 12-year-olds, or inappropriate for 10th graders. Some schools provided the option where students over the age of 18 can read the library's copy with a parent permission whereas some schools completely banned it from the library.
I can understand why the book would be banned--I have actually read it. I agree that it's not something that the average 12-year-old would read because of the pace of book and the subject matter. The first few "chapters" (the book is written in letter format) pass in a slow speed that's somewhat confusing the first read-through. I would just imagine that anyone who isn't mature enough to handle the subject matter wouldn't even make it pass the first 50 pages. It is an intriguing read that I think should be available at the high school level. I do feel like that the book should at least have a note or forewarning provided by the librarian or teacher that the book does have some language and sexuality, almost like what they do for television shows and movies.
http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1045361-The-Color-Purple-and-Its-Controversy
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.china/2005-11/msg00592.html
http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/frequentlychallenged/challengesbytype/index.cfm
What to do if a book is challenged
List of Challenged books
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
War movies
I don't spend a lot of time watching movies, so I haven't seen many wartime movies. I have, however, seen a mini television series that depicts World War II. The story follows a group of soldiers as they bear the wrath of war. The producers aimed more towards historical accuracy, which includes death and injury.
Because of this, they don't glamorize the war at all. It shows the traumatic events in an artistic and respectful manner. Much like Slaughterhouse-Five, it depicts what the war is like through the eyes of the soldiers. Although, it does represent the men more like triumphant heroes than portrayed in Slaughterhouse-Five. But it's not the the extent that Mary O'Hare wouldn't approve of it. It still shows the disturbing sides of war, but it's balanced out to make an enjoyable series.
Because of this, they don't glamorize the war at all. It shows the traumatic events in an artistic and respectful manner. Much like Slaughterhouse-Five, it depicts what the war is like through the eyes of the soldiers. Although, it does represent the men more like triumphant heroes than portrayed in Slaughterhouse-Five. But it's not the the extent that Mary O'Hare wouldn't approve of it. It still shows the disturbing sides of war, but it's balanced out to make an enjoyable series.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Physics of Tralfamadore
there are a few thing that come from the Tralfamadorian world that may baffle some people. Hopefully, this may clear some things up. But I do give caution: it may confuse a lot of people!
THE DAY/NIGHT CYCLE
On page 133, Billy states that the Tralfamadorian world has 1 hour of night time to 62 hours of daylight. The common question: HOW?
Well, there are many solar systems which have two starts instead of one star in the center. These are called binary star systems. If Tralfamadore revolved around only one of the stars in the binary star system, the planet rotation speed and year cycle can be set in a way that could follow that day/night pattern. Just think of it like there are two suns in the sky. Here's a diagram showing the visual representation:
THE WHOLE 4TH DIMENSION CONCEPT
So, to put things into perspective, imagine a die and a piece of paper. The cuber has 3 dimensions to itself--an x, y, and z. the paper only has two--an x and a y. Imagine that we can only see everything on the 2-D world. If we place the dice, a 3-D object, on to the 2-D piece of paper, we are able to see the dice. However, we cannot see ALL of the die.
So, the Tralfamadorians are able to see in the 4-D world. It would probably mean that they exist in 4-D. What Billy is able to see of them is only a small part of the Tralfamadorians, just like we're only able to see a small part of the die on the piece of paper.
Now, image that there are multiple pieces of paper. The multiple pieces can intersect the die, each viewing a different portion of the die. The paper could be on one side, close to the middle, or on the end of it.
These pieces of paper represent time. We can only see what exists of the die in that particular position of the piece of paper--no other sides to it. To the Tralfamadorians, they can see all of the die, not just that piece of paper we are limited to seeing.
THE CONCEPT OF FREE WILL
I personally side with the Tralfamadorians with the concept of no free will. Let's say I'm given two options: I can either stab you in the hand with a pencil or give you five dollars. It's my choice to do either--the future of how you react to me would be different--you'd either be angry or happy.
If I make the initial choice of "give you 5 bucks," your future response will be happy. The future would be set, so the tralfamadorians would foresee you being happy. The future of you being angry isn't going to happen, so the option of me stabbing you with a pencil wouldn't happen. Because the future is pre-determined (by the process of elimination), there ISn't another option.
It's only human perception that we have free will. We cannot see the future. We cannot see what happens with option A, B, C, etc.. We can only see what options we have, and postulate what the future can be. We can only perceive that our decision making is changing the future--even though the future is already determined because we already made that decision.
Hope that this cleared some questions, although the side effects may include more questions! lololol
THE DAY/NIGHT CYCLE
On page 133, Billy states that the Tralfamadorian world has 1 hour of night time to 62 hours of daylight. The common question: HOW?
Well, there are many solar systems which have two starts instead of one star in the center. These are called binary star systems. If Tralfamadore revolved around only one of the stars in the binary star system, the planet rotation speed and year cycle can be set in a way that could follow that day/night pattern. Just think of it like there are two suns in the sky. Here's a diagram showing the visual representation:
THE WHOLE 4TH DIMENSION CONCEPT
So, to put things into perspective, imagine a die and a piece of paper. The cuber has 3 dimensions to itself--an x, y, and z. the paper only has two--an x and a y. Imagine that we can only see everything on the 2-D world. If we place the dice, a 3-D object, on to the 2-D piece of paper, we are able to see the dice. However, we cannot see ALL of the die.
So, the Tralfamadorians are able to see in the 4-D world. It would probably mean that they exist in 4-D. What Billy is able to see of them is only a small part of the Tralfamadorians, just like we're only able to see a small part of the die on the piece of paper.
Now, image that there are multiple pieces of paper. The multiple pieces can intersect the die, each viewing a different portion of the die. The paper could be on one side, close to the middle, or on the end of it.
These pieces of paper represent time. We can only see what exists of the die in that particular position of the piece of paper--no other sides to it. To the Tralfamadorians, they can see all of the die, not just that piece of paper we are limited to seeing.
THE CONCEPT OF FREE WILL
I personally side with the Tralfamadorians with the concept of no free will. Let's say I'm given two options: I can either stab you in the hand with a pencil or give you five dollars. It's my choice to do either--the future of how you react to me would be different--you'd either be angry or happy.
If I make the initial choice of "give you 5 bucks," your future response will be happy. The future would be set, so the tralfamadorians would foresee you being happy. The future of you being angry isn't going to happen, so the option of me stabbing you with a pencil wouldn't happen. Because the future is pre-determined (by the process of elimination), there ISn't another option.
It's only human perception that we have free will. We cannot see the future. We cannot see what happens with option A, B, C, etc.. We can only see what options we have, and postulate what the future can be. We can only perceive that our decision making is changing the future--even though the future is already determined because we already made that decision.
Hope that this cleared some questions, although the side effects may include more questions! lololol
Thursday, May 12, 2011
A Group
While there are dreadful times littered with loneliness, there are pockets of joy filled with people. It doesn't imply that more people mean more happiness--the only correlation is that the quality of surrounding people directly increases happiness. A group of two can easily be more enjoyable than a group of 20, 12, or even 4 people.
Hanging out with my friend was a high quality time. Battling each other in Super Smash Bros on the Wii, sitting on the couch, and having a it's-my-space-on-the-couch was a great way to pass a few hours in the basement. It didn't matter that there were only the two of us. We made the world shrink into the size of a room, and I felt connected to everyone within our world.
Hanging out with my friend was a high quality time. Battling each other in Super Smash Bros on the Wii, sitting on the couch, and having a it's-my-space-on-the-couch was a great way to pass a few hours in the basement. It didn't matter that there were only the two of us. We made the world shrink into the size of a room, and I felt connected to everyone within our world.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



